I find that some writers in newspaper look at writing an article as just stringing adjectives and nouns to come up with unsubstantiated theories on people (latest person being targeted is Mr. Narendra Modi) to get their pay. To write without facts only hampers their reputation by implying 'Paid News'.
I truly feel sorry for newspapers paying them.
Who are they? They aren't worth mentioning and I wouldn't advertise them by naming them. I steadfastly ignore their articles after sampling a few reads - One should know whom to read and whom not to read.
Words:
Unsubstantiated = not established by proof or competent evidence
Chequebook journalism = The form of journalism where the journalist pays the subject of the work money for the right to publish his story. It suggests Stories obtained by paying people are not so worthy as those obtained by traditional investigations.
